The recorded task
On 24 April 2026, an owner-run AiOrch session built a Python Todo CLI with SQLite persistence, data validation, an argparse interface and packaging. It is a software demonstration, with a public demo repository, rather than a customer deployment.
The session assigned three implementation roles: core logic, CLI presentation, and packaging/documentation. Core logic and packaging began together; the CLI agent started after its core dependency was approved. The work used separate branches, not three workers editing one checkout.
Review changed the implementation
All three implementation agents received changes-requested feedback and subsequently recorded approved final verdicts. The responses covered scope cleanup, CLI error handling, and packaging/documentation corrections. Approval is a review result, not a claim that every possible defect was eliminated.
| Step | Recorded outcome |
|---|---|
| Implementation | 3 agents assigned; all 3 eventually approved |
| Branch integration | A CLI branch conflict was recorded and later resolved |
| Integrated result | 3 of 3 branches marked merged inside the session |
| Independent audit | A separate session used 4 audit/follow-up agents |
| GitHub delivery | A public pull request exists; it was still open when checked |
The record contains session-resume events and conflict resolution. It does not establish a run without operator intervention, nor identify the actor for every resume.
The audit corrected the test count
The parent final report claimed 36 tests. The independent audit reran python -m pytest tests/ -v and recorded 35 passed, with exit status zero. It also recorded a successful CLI import check. This case uses the audited count rather than repeating the initial report.
The audit identified report/specification discrepancies and prepared follow-up fixes, including date-model consistency and empty-update behavior. Its session completed with four approved agents. The inspected audit record did not show a merged audit result, so completion of that audit must not be read as proof that every follow-up was integrated into the public PR.
Inspect the public handoff
Demo-projects pull request #5 was created on 24 April 2026. GitHub still reported it as open, with no merge timestamp, when checked on 5 October 2026. The integrated session branch and a merged GitHub PR are different delivery states.
The historical run reported planning with Opus, implementation roles using Kimi, Sonnet and Haiku labels, and review using a Codex default label. Exact model revisions and the historical AiOrch build were not established from the inspected record.
What this example establishes
This is evidence of task decomposition, dependency-aware work, review revisions, conflict resolution, an independent audit and a public handoff. It is not a benchmark against another tool or proof of production reliability.
The original task file was removed during the development review; the audit reconstructed the specification from saved session configuration. A reusable run should preserve its approved specification as an audit artifact.
Usage data was missing for several agents. The dashboard’s displayed zero cost is not evidence that the work was free; no total cost or time-saving claim is made here. Historical test results were inspected, not rerun during this publication.
Learn how to configure these controls in review and validation, or start with the installation guide.